On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 13:09, Paul Vixie <vi...@isc.org> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:01:04 -0500 > Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > >Rather than guess, we should treat the absence of a From: header in > > >an outgoing message as a configuration error and abort the send. This > > >change makes the creation of a components file with a 'From:' header > > >mandatory; the code that initializes the Mail/ folder should > > >probably be extended to prompt for a default From address which is > > >then used to create a minimal components file. > > > > So, what do people think of this idea? This would be arguably the > > most correct solution, but it would be a significant change from > > the way nmh has behaved in the past. > > i think this is fine. nmh should gradually encourage people to make a > few changes here and there. > > If we are going to change the behavior in any significant way then we should make it a major release (i.e. 2.0).
Thanks Jeff -- Jeffrey C. Honig <j...@honig.net> http://www.honig.net/jch GnuPG ID:14E29E13 <http://www.honig.net/jch/key.shtml>
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
