>What do you mean by "internal representation"? Conversion from >any to utf-8, processing by the code and conversion back to the >original charset is really internal, transparent for the user.
Well, for example ... when you call fmt_scan(), what should the character set be? Just one example. That's what I mean by internal representation. >> Now my plan >> was to convert from UTF-8 to the native character set, but that >> conversion won't be perfect. > >But such the internall conversion would be perfect, no new >characters is introduced (except formatting like newlines, >spaces). Depending on what the character set was in the original message, of course. >The question is: what charset will be in draft for edition? >Original, converted to something (e.g. according to locale) or >utf-8. This is no longer internal. It will either be based on the locale or UTF-8. I'll know more when I get into the exact details. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
