On 2012-02-05, at 4:04 PM, David Levine wrote: > Cygwin doesn't have a /bin/mail, either. I didn't bring it > up before because it obviously "doesn't count", so no need > to jump on it. And I don't use it for mail, but I don't want > to break nmh on it, either.
For a system that doesn't have a binmail -- like windows -- your argument makes perfect sense. But your claim that 'I didn't install binmail' on a system that includes it, doesn't. > procmail can be configured to use whatever locking a user > wants. Let's leave nmh that way, too. And again, an end user configuring their system into a stupid state is not justification for nmh to follow suit. How about submitting a patch set that makes nmh work reasonably under cygwin. I'm not the only person who would rejoice. --lyndon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
