ken wrote:
> As previously discussed, I've been looking at putting the "From" address
> in message draft via extensions to the format language (the existing
> syntax doesn't have that ability).
can you expand on that? what is it that can't be done?
>
> I see two possibilities as to how to implement this:
>
> - A new function, e.g. %(localmbox).
can't this be done now, with something like "%(profile Local-Mailbox)"?
(or similar -- my mh-format skilz are sketchy at best.)
paul
>
> - A new pseudo-component, e.g. %{localmbox}.
>
> In terms of implementation ... they are probably a wash. The first
> requires a new format instruction; the second does not, but it does
> require some stuff in the interpreter side, and that actually is a
> little bit magical as components you are interested in are "seeded"
> before you call fmt_scan() (this is why some programs use a special
> "text" component); obviously this one would be handled internally.
>
> The advantage to doing it as a component would be you could use address
> functions like %(proper) on it (but I don't know how common that is).
> The disadvantage is that you could never have a "real" message component
> called "localmbox"; I don't know how common that would be either.
>
> Thoughts? I've gone back and forth on this and I don't really know
> which would be better.
>
> --Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=---------------------
paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 37.8 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
