>Tet writes: >> I'd rather not have a perl dependency in nmh. > >I agree, but having Ken's script be in a contrib, e.g. under >/usr/share/doc/nmh after installation, would mean no package dependency >is required as it's not intended to be in a user's PATH?
Yeah, that's what I was thinking; I totally understand what Tethys is talking about. I think if we put this in "contrib" it shouldn't cause a package dependency. Although as I understand it it seems the distributed packages out there are still based on 1.3, but that's another problem :-/ Also, the script really isn't end-user ready ... it needs a bit of customization. But I'd at least like it out there so people have a standard place to find it. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
