valdis.kletni...@vt.edu writes:
>--==_Exmh_1335562212_1978P
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:48:19 -0700, n...@dad.org said:
>> command is not executed until no other 'mhlock -all' is running, and
>> until
>> no relevant nmh program is running. While command is running no other
>> mhlock -all runs nor does any relevant nmh program run.
>
>If 'command' is a shell script that ends up inadvertently calling something
>that calls mhlock itself, you just deadlocked. And blindly changing the
>call inside the script to have a --noblock semantic may not be right either,
>as then it would be unsafe to run the script standalone without an mhlock
>wrapper...
You are right!
How about an environment variable, say NMH_LOCK. When NMH_LOCK is set,
mhlock -all would ignore locking. Otherwise mhlock -all would set it before
executing command, but after obtaining the lock, and unset it when command
exits, but before relinquishing the lock.
>Locking is hard
Sure is. But that doesn't mean that it should be ignored.
Norman Shapiro
798 Barron Avenue
Palo Alto CA 94306-3109
(650) 565-8215
n...@dad.org
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
