Hi David,
> > Perhaps have mark work on it as it already partially does. `mark
> > -seq cur -delete all'.
>
> How about this, Ralph? Instead of setting "cur" to 0, it ends up
> removing it from .mh_sequences. That's the same state as never having
> set cur.
Sounds good.
> @@ -80,8 +80,14 @@ seq_delsel (struct msgs *mp, char *cp, int public, int
> zero)
> * Now clear the bit on all selected messages
> */
> - for (msgnum = mp->lowsel; msgnum <= mp->hghsel; msgnum++)
> + for (msgnum = mp->lowsel; msgnum <= mp->hghsel; msgnum++) {
> if (is_selected (mp, msgnum))
> clear_sequence (mp, i, msgnum);
>
> + if (! strcmp ("cur", cp) && mp->curmsg == msgnum) {
> + /* Removed current message indication, so reset curmsg. */
> + mp->curmsg = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
Does the test need to be in the for-loop, running on every message?
Perhaps
if (!strcmp(cp, current) &&
mp->curmsg >= mp->lowsel && mp->curmsg <= mp->hghsel) {
/* Removed current message indication, so reset curmsg. */
mp->curmsg = 0;
}
afterwards? (Note use of `current'.)
Cheers, Ralph.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
