Hi Jeff,

> > Feeding rmmproc filenames on stdin is the normal workaround, LF or
> > NUL terminated.
> 
> Changing the way rmmproc is called would break all out existing
> scripts.

Clearly, yes.  There'd be to be some indication that the rmmproc desired
it, or a run-time test done to show it copes.  I'd prefer the former.

Cheers, Ralph.

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to