ken wrote: > >but now isn't then. it's too bad we can't make rmmproc work as well > >as a modern rm. but having just browsed the mh sources a bit, i > >begin to see the problem. as always. :-) > > Well, it all depends on "we". If by "we" you mean "Ken Hornstein", > then I've already stated my feelings on that subject. > > If by "we" you mean, "Paul Fox", then please don't let me stop you :-)
hey, i said i've begun to see the problem: too much code for too few developers. :-) > > --Ken > > _______________________________________________ > Nmh-workers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers =--------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 31.5 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
