Ken wrote: > >+ /* If using an rmmproc, check for MAXARGS overflow before > >+ modifying anything. If not using an rmmproc, we don't > >+ pass the message files to another process, so this check > >+ isn't necessary. This check also isn't necessary if > >+ NFOLDERS < MAXARGS - 1, because there's a check above for > >+ filep <=3D NFOLDERS, but do it in that case just to be safe. = > */ > > Paul Fox's patch removes the MAXARGS limit, so I don't think capping the > limit to MAXARGS in refile is right. Maybe this isn't a problem anymore > in practice since newer operating systems have huge execve() limits?
And the dynamic allocation of the vector to hold the arguments is unlikely to fail. Fine with me. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
