Harald wrote: > But those who actually want to keep originals for something > other than just debugging: Will they want to refile etc. them? > > I don't know the answer and even if it is "yes", I don't have a > solution. But I think these things should be discussed, otherwise > the next day somebody will come and implement a switch to rmm or > some other existing nmh command to somehow handle originals together > with the message itself.
Agreed. I'll reply to Ralph, I like his rmmproc approach. > Sorry, that's probably my poor english grammar. The question I was > wondering about is: Should messages in "preferred form" have headers > like > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > (which I think is the minimum for RFC conform 8bit messages) or should > such headers be stripped. I have come to the conclusion that these > headers are to be present. I agree, I don't think it's a good idea to strip headers. mhfixmsg has to modify C-T and C-T-E when it changes the content, of course. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
