Ken wrote: > >> - Do nothing. Not as weird as it sounds; if messages aren't on the > >> sequence, they'll get removed next time the sequence file is written. > > > >Yes but an intervening folder -pack would mess that up. > > Actually, it would work out fine. If messages don't exist they won't > get added to the interal sequence list when the folder is read, so when > folder -pack writes out the sequence file the extra messages in > the sequence would just vanish.
Makes sense. I see that you fixed things anyways, looks good, and simpler, now. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
