Ken wrote: > M. Levinson sent me private email and pointed out that it's not QUITE > a one-line change; some casts are needed in the sequence macros to > prevent bit-shifts from overflowing an int. He was kind enough to > send me patches that did that, so I'll probably integrate that today > along with Paul's suggestions.
Would that bring us to where a 32-bit executable could lose information created by a 64-bit executable via a common sequences file? If so, either we shouldn't do it, or should add code to protect against the loss. It's wrong to allow silent loss. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
