Ken wrote: > >One question: would it make sense to put the entire mhbuild > >directive in the Nmh-Attachment header instead of just the > >path? Users could then edit it as they wish. > > I feel the answer is "no". I would like to give users the option to > add their own Nmh-Attachment headers; if that's just a filename, > that's reasonable. If it's a mhbuild directive, then it's not.
It depends on priorities: I'd rather be able to customize an attachment than manually insert a simple Nmh-Attachment header (I think that's the option you mention). I've never done that. Or given that you're fixing the header field name, we could support both. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
