Ken Hornstein wrote: > Err ... that _would_ work with the proposed scheme, right? I mean, assuming > you had a profile entry that used w3m to convert the HTML to text, this > would continue to work. So I'm unclear why we need two mechanisms.
Yes, it continues to work. I should probably just think about better ways to script around it. > I'm trying to understand why you wouldn't want to show all text parts. > It seems like 90%+ of the emails I get have a text part (either plain or > HTML) as the first item, then non-text content afterwards. Where later parts are text, they are often intended as attachments: XML files, patches etc. I know I tried using "-type text" and I may have forgotten all the reasons for not keeping it. Oliver _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
