ken wrote: > >> I ... do not believe it will result in a functional change. I think > >> that problem exists already. Also ... if you did that, exactly what > >> are you trying to do, anyway? > > > >I often refile(1) with the source and destination folder the same; > >`refile @. 42'. My +inbox is ever growing, ~/bin/sc does a scan of the > >last `tput lines` - 1 of messages. If I want to collect emails I'm > >about to process to the bottom of my inbox then I `refile @. ...'. > > Hm. Does that happen to work with 1.6? I ask because I think you'll
i just tried it, since i do that same operation pretty often. it works fine. paul > get a locking failure now, even if you aren't using -retainsequence. > It looks like all folders are opened with locking set ... and I think > that would cause sequence file lock contention. Would be nice to > get that resolved before 1.6 goes out the door. > > --Ken > > _______________________________________________ > Nmh-workers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers ---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 45.0 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
