ken wrote: > You know ... as long as we're on this subject. > > I see that there is no longer any difference between the %(tws) and > %(pretty) escape, since David Levine removed the backend code that > differentiated this in commit 0c926c599d9def7f70. Because it didn't > work (it would return the local timezone symbolic name always, rather > than the timezone of the specified date). So that makes me wonder if > we should still try to bother to generate a symbolic timezone name. It > looks like the only portable way to do this is to have an internal list > of timezone names. A large part of me says to not bother. What do > others think?
i'd prefer symbolic, but i understand that it's probably complicated to get right. paul =---------------------- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 36.1 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
