On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> wrote: > Note that I was only suggesting that the timezone be displayed at the > local side, and although I didn't mention it I was only going to suggest > it support IETF-sanctioned timezones. But it seems like there's little > political will for that.
I get that. But where things get trippy is when the sender includes a TZ name you don't recognize, with no accompanying ±nnnn offset info. Yes, this violates 822, but I have a lot of mail in my archives with 'BST' in the <zone> part of the Date header, rather than a ±nnnn token.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
