Hi Jon, > I am in no way an expert on this. But, I won't let that stop me.
That's the spirit! > The reason why I think that Unicode is appropriate is that it has been > designed to be a superset of all other character sets. Being that the > RFCs allow the mixing of character sets, Unicode allows them to be > represented without having to encode "bank switching". I realize that > doing this requires a library that does all of the Unicode character > handling properly, which is not a trivial task. If you skim through the Table of Contents at the start of http://www.gnu.org/software/libunistring/manual/libunistring.html you'll see it handles a lot of the nitty-gritty for you. (Other libraries suggested probably do the same, I just happen to know this one.) Cheers, Ralph. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers