ken wrote: > >> Thoughts? I realize this is a significant behavior change > > > >+1. The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in > >addition to the existing `Attach'. Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if > >the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the > >time? > > Sigh. I think when we hashed this out last time, the (rough) consensus > was that not puttting in a "Nmh-" prefix was fine. Attach had prior > art (I think mutt used it), and Forward seems to be similarly named.
i vote for presenting the user with a user-friendly component name. if conflict is an issue, could we make the names of these "special" headers tuneable via a profile entry? Nmh-Attach-Component: Attach Nmh-Forward-Component: Forward paul =---------------------- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 45.1 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers