Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> writes:
>>Would it be hard to provide a similar guarantee for "-whom"? Like, if present,
>>it would always be the first argument, or it would always be the next-to-last
>>argument,or some such?
>
>It looks like it's always the first argument now; seems easy enough
>to keep that the way it is.
Those two guarantees would make it easier to write a postproc that would
be robust against changes in post and the way it's called.
Norman Shapiro
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
