Hi David, > Not 100%, so your point is well taken, but higher than I expected.
It occurs to me that it may be quicker to write tests that aim to increase coverage rather than test actual output against expected, etc. That would then give valgrind more to chew on. They could then be fleshed out separately, especially if they were marked in some way, to have their results checked. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
