>It's bad because nmh's source needs a lot of clean up, at small and >large scale, due to decades of changing expectations, conventions, and >bit rot. And tests to help spot regressions in doing that.
Ralph has hit the nail on the head. It seems a large part of nmh development is cleaning up old crap from 30 years ago. At least, larger than I would like. Also, bringing nmh forward really means retooling a bunch of internal stuff. I've done that for some things, but it's a big job and we still have more to do. Now, perhaps people would argue that nmh doesn't need to be brought forward that much; I would respectfully disagree, but there are some small things people ask for all of the time that really need larger changes to happen. I wish I had more time to work on those things. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
