Hi David,

> > (I think under debian/ubuntu, the vi dependency would be a
> > "suggested" installation, not a requirement.)
>
> I don't know of a good way to do that in a Fedora RPM spec.  I don't
> consider mentioning it in the rpm description to be "good".

I've been poking about.  Here's some links and extracts from them.

    
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Effect_of_the_UsrMove_Fedora_Feature
    Things that history has placed into /bin, /sbin, /lib, or /lib64
    should be listed in the %files section as being in those
    directories.

So it's reasonable that Fedora's vim package recently moved /bin/vi to
/usr/bin;  it's far too big for /bin.  :-)

    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Weak_dependencies
    Weak dependencies (Recommends:, Suggests:, Supplements: and
    Enhances:) MAY be used to specify relationships between packages
    which are less strict than mandatory requirements.

Weak dependencies are a recentish addition to RPM specs AIUI.

    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies
    Weak dependencies should be used where possible to minimize the
    installation for reasonable use cases, especially for building
    virtual machines or containers that have a single purpose only and
    do not require the full feature set of the package.

`where possible'.  nmh is readily usable without a text editor, e.g. for
incoming mail filtering, so I don't think it should be a Requires.
Looking at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nmh/blob/master/f/nmh.spec
I'd say /usr/sbin/sendmail, libcurl, and w3m are similarly weak?

An aside: Does any package other than vim provide /usr/bin/vi?  I think
the command might be `dnf provides /usr/bin/vi'.  I expect it's a bunch
of different sized vim-based packages.

Package cronie provides crontab(1) that F27's
https://manned.org/crontab/b340cf46 says uses $VISUAL, then $EDITOR, for
`-e' but I don't see a dependency for an editor, weak or otherwise, in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cronie/blob/master/f/cronie.spec.  I
suspect other editor-using packages also ignore this.  I don't think
Fedora has a generic feature package like `text-editor' that multiple
editor packages can satisfy;  certainly
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ed/blob/master/f/ed.spec doesn't seem
to provide it.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy

-- 
nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to