>We can't really change the behavior of %(trim), but we COULD easily add >a new function (maybe %(trimr) ?) that would return a value and be >easier for you to use in this case. But it wouldn't appear until a >new nmh was released.
It turns out adding a %(trimr) function was literally one line of code, so I added it. Caveats about it not appearing until a new release still apply, unfortunately. --Ken -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
