>> I am thinking that falling back to getpwuid(getuid()) is the most
>> reasonable approach
>
>I notice that a setuid inc(1) has various troubles due to the use of
>real user ID rather than effective.

Like ... what?  I would have though using the real UID would have been the
correct answer.  Also, I didn't even think we supported that; at most
we support setgid to the mail group (and it's a huge pile of code which
I personally would love to get rid of).

--Ken

-- 
nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to