>I could not disagree more, and if its for political reasons; >i think that today with TLS plain passwords are all you need, >other cruft should leave codebases as soon as possible.
Well, obviously I disagree with that but I will point out that without the right architecture in place if all you support is PLAIN over TLS then doing anything ELSE is hard because you don't have the architecture in place to expand beyond that. Whatever else you say about nmh, at least we have what I feel is a reasonable network security architecture now, with the concept of handling different SASL mechanisms and enough abstraction that if a new SASL mechanism is developed it's easy to add it to all network protocols at once. --Ken -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
