Hi Conrad, Wow, thanks! I'll look at your patch in more detail later. For now,
- I am confused about the tests though: when I run the relevant > commands by hand, I get a +0100 timezone for the first one, which I > kindof think I should expect (the event starts during summer time, > GMT+1); when run as part of the build, I get +0000. Perhaps someone > who better understands the test framework could review? > mhical obeys TZ. If not set, behavior is implementation defined. Some of the tests set TZ, that's the best way to get consistent results. - I had a brief look at "properly" extending > icalparse.y, but I kindof think any serious extension of mhical > should really instead adopt libical? > Definitely worth considering. I see that it's subject to two alternative licenses, we'd have to sort through that first. David
