ken wrote: > > > >But maybe you're not fond of the concept, rather than just the name? > > Oh, no, the CONCEPT is fine, I just didn't love the name. I like > -range/-norange slightly better, but I still don't find it great. > Something like -compress/-nocompress MIGHT be better, but again, I'm > not loving it.
Maybe shrink/noshrink? I'll let all these sit for a day, then commit something. paul =---------------------- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 72.9 degrees)