Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> wrote: >> I rather wish that NMH would take a "Path" to be... >> well.. $PATH-like thing, such that I could move folders to an archive >> machine, with NMH being aware that they are elsewhere.
> You're allowed to give an absolute path as a folder name. E.g., you could > do something like: > % scan +/ssw/users/mcr/Mail/outgoing/y2001 last:50 Yes, I do that, for sure. > Or whatever, and that will be the current folder. You can also push > them on the folder stack. If you want them to show up when you do > "folders", that's harder. I don't know what the folder stack is. I want them to show up when I do "folders --historical" or something like that. I also imagine being able to send the compute commands involved to the machine with the disks, and... I had just assumed we'd all have our own storage robots by now. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature