Dear nmusers,
 
Since Rik Schoemaker's original e-mail a few weeks ago, the code
associated with the NONPARAMETRIC option has been reviewed.  There are
problems (bugs) that  may reveal themselves when the data set contains
individuals with different active etas.  For example, a data set with
some individuals receiving only IV doses while others receive only oral
doses may exhibit this bug.  For the individuals receiving only IV
doses, the eta's associated with absorption-related parameter such as
F1, ALAG1, KA will be nonactive.  At this time it appears, but it is not
certain, that the bugs will only affect the resulting estimates when the
data set contains individuals with different active etas.   Code changes
to address these bugs are being reviewed and tested.  Anyone who has a
control stream and data set for which they have applied the
NONPARAMETRIC option is welcome to send these to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
for testing with the modified routine.  We hope to provide fixes in the
near future.
 
Tom Ludden

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rik Schoemaker
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NMusers] Nonparametric Modelling


Dear Julie,
 
Thank you for your comments! Unfortunately the parametric step runs just
fine... :-)
 
Cheers,
 
Rik

>>> "Julie ANTIC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04-07-07 3:48 PM >>>

The nonparametric option will only estimate the distribution of ETA. The
fixed parameters of your model (THETA(1), THETA(2),...,THETA(8)) should
be estimated before the non parametric step with a parametric procedure
($EST...).
By default, if the (parametric) estimation ($EST) step failed, the
nonparametric step is not run. I think, it is your problem because the
UNCONDITIONAL option just permits to run the nonparametric step when the
$EST step has failed.
 
If I were you, I would try to run the command file without the
$NONPARAMETRIC option, and correct eventuel errors...
 
I hope it'll help, good luck,
Julie Antic 

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Rik Schoemaker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 2:30 PM
        Subject: [NMusers] Nonparametric Modelling

        Dear all,
         
        I'm trying to implement nonparametric population parameter
estimation in NONMEM VI but I run into the following error message:
         
        NONPARAMETRIC ESTIMATE REQUESTED.  BUT NO INDIVIDUAL RECORDS
EXIST WITH DATA MODELED WITH ACTIVE ETA'S
         
        As a result no tables are output at all. However, if I leave out
the 
        $NONP UNCONDITIONAL
        the model runs fine and I do get my tables...
         
        Any clues?
         
        Thanks in advance!
         
        Rik Schoemaker
         
         
        $PROB   PK C1
        $INPUT  ID TRT TIME NDV DV CMT AMT SS RATE II MDV WT
        $DATA   DRUG4.NM
        $SUBROUTINES ADVAN4 TRANS4
        $PK
        TABS  = THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1))
        KA    = 0.692/TABS
        S2    = THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2))
        V2    = S2
        V3    = THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3))
        CL    = THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4))
        Q     = THETA(5)*EXP(ETA(5))
        ALAG1 = THETA(6)*EXP(ETA(6))
        F1    = THETA(7)*EXP(ETA(7))
        $ERROR
        IPRED = LOG(.025)
        W     = THETA(8)
        IF(F.GT.0) IPRED = LOG(F)
        IRES  = IPRED-DV
        IWRES = IRES/W
        Y     = IPRED+ERR(1)*W
        $THETA 1 15 60 12 15 0.6 0.45 0.3
        $OMEGA .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1
        $SIGMA 1 FIXED
        $EST   PRINT=1 MAXEVAL 9999 POSTHOC NOABORT METHOD=1
        MSFO=msfb1
        $NONP UNCONDITIONAL
        $COV PRINT=E
        $TABLE ID TIME NDV DV CMT AMT SS RATE II MDV WT
        IPRED IRES IWRES FILE = SDTAB1
        ONEHEADER NOPRINT
        $TABLE ID ALAG1 TABS S2 V3 CL Q F1 FILE=PATAB1
        ONEHEADER NOPRINT
        
         
        First few data lines:
         
        1 0 0 . . 1 175000 1 . 12 1 58
        1 0 0.05 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 0.2166666667 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 0.3833333333 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 0.55 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 0.7166666667 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 0.8833333333 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 1 1206 7.0950643773 2 . . . . 0 58
        1 0 1.05 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 1.2166666667 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 1.3833333333 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 1.55 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 1.7166666667 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 1.8833333333 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 2 1206 7.0950643773 2 . . . . 0 58
        1 0 2.05 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 2.2166666667 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 2.3833333333 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 2.55 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 2.7166666667 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 2.8833333333 . . 2 . . . . 1 58
        1 0 3 975 6.882437471 2 . . . . 0 58
        



_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged 
information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the 
e-mail address. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the 
sender, so that ICON plc can arrange for proper delivery and then 
please delete the message.  Thank You.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Reply via email to