I believe that all the companies whose logos were used gave us explicit permission to do so.
But yes, they're kind of big, and it's not all that necessary to be able to render the website from the tarball. Removing them from the git repo would be a bit more annoying. Is it causing you legal hassles to have them in the repo at all, or just in the dist tarballs? Thanks. On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:22, Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/02/2012 12:14, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> Hi, >> for example we have the twitter logo, painted green, that violates : >> https://support.twitter.com/articles/77641-guidelines-for-use-of-the-twitter-trademark >> >> I didn't check (yet) the other linkedin, microsoft, ebay and yahoo logos. >> They're all part of the nodejs.org homepage, is it really necessary >> to include that homepage into the released tarball ? >> The API docs already includes links to it. > > > doc/community/not-invented-here.png > > where is the author's permission, as stated by > © Not Invented Here LLC. Images and text may not be reproduced without > authors' permission > > Jérémy. > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
