On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Chris Scribner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Matt, > > The original post started with an observation and a request for more > details, presumably from those who know what's going on under the > hood. I didn't detect any hint of "expecting Node to compare well with > nginx or Apache." > You should follow other channels too - this comes up all the time on stackoverflow and on the IRC channel. > A conversation about the underlying differences in the servers and > thoughts on how or how much node can be optimized would have been > welcome. > I value technical contributions, and asking for benchmarks in response to some of the comments made was an attempt to get facts rather than wishy washy comments. > Instead, your response was not only unhelpful, but condescending. > I'm sorry you felt that way. Emotions are hard to convey via an email list. > Shouldn't we appreciate and support others' efforts - as it could lead > directly to improvements in node? > I did that in several posts. One in particular pointed out the things you will have to support in order to equate to what nginx is doing under the hood. That's a technical contribution, even if it didn't provide code. Matt. -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
