On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Joe Developer
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 15, 10:49 am, Jim Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Interesting... Have you considering allowing signup via BrowserID?
>> > > Recommended!
>> >
>> > > I wasn't aware of BrowersID. I just tried it with their demo site and
>> was
>> >
>> > underwhelmed. The signin process was not fast, and in the end I was
>> forced
>> > to create another password. I much prefer OAuth.
>>
>> Read deeper. You sign up once with a BrowserID provider (eventually
>> most webmail services will be) and then have one-click registration
>> with BrowserID-based services. It is the future of web logins.
>>
>> As for my off-topic comment, my main point is that issue advocacy by
>> large groups of poorly-informed people has a corrosive effect on
>> policy-making. It is not the solution to the ownership of
>> representatives by corporate interests thru campaign contributions,
>> etc. But you're right, it's probably inevitable given the ease of
>> manipulating people via social media.
>>
>
> I think this is a discussion worth having, though this may or may not be a
> good venue.
> Personally I think that you are selling yourself short by implying that
> you are inexorably and permanently poorly-informed, Liam :D
>
> While it seems, to me, that imposed or adopted governance models are
> subject to cyclical trends, I would be surprised if direct democracy isn't
> one of the impending 'experiments' - and why not try to see what could make
> it a positive experience?
>
> As for what you bring up in terms of manipulation, isn't that the current
> reality? And might that not be exacerbated by limited choices in terms of
> representative platforms, not to mention limited opportunities for
> fine-grained input into informing their mandate?
>

... And that perspective is why I find the current format and functionality
of "Coalitions" unfortunate. Ah Well.


>
>
>>
>> --
>> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
>> Posting guidelines:
>> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "nodejs" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to