Oh cool! and I found
setTimeout(console.log, 1000, 'hello world')
is much better than
setTimeout(function(){
console.log('hello world');
}, 1000)
在 2012年4月23日 下午2:32，Joran Greef <jo...@ronomon.com>写道：
> If you pass a function reference to an existing function to setTimeout,
> and then call this function repeatedly, rather than creating a closure each
> setTimeout call, that will lower your memory and cpu overhead substantially.
>
>
> On Monday, April 23, 2012 7:49:08 AM UTC+2, Jason.桂林 wrote:
>>
>> I need to write a service use something like in memory cache, and I want
>> to do `expire` things in setTimeout, will it very slow, If I expire too
>> much things, about kilos to millions.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jason Green
>> 桂林
>>
>>
>> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines:
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>
--
Best regards,
Jason Green
桂林
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
