Just stick with MIT. It makes everyone the most comfortable. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Ken <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm in the processing of releasing open-source clients (including one for > node) for a currently free but planned freemium service (which is not open > source). I don't care at all about people copying/modifying the code of > the client (so would default to MIT or similar) but in its default mode the > only thing the client does is communicate with the service and thus its use > should adhere to the terms of service. Anyone have pointers (or precedent) > for the right kind of license to use for this? > > --Ken > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
