"completeness" is overrated. it's much better to be able to assume that a handler on nextTick() will be run after the full setup phase and that more required loading is will not happen after. removing features enable us to make better assumptions, eventually those assumptions are then features themselves :)
minimalism, it's a beautiful thing. -Mikeal On May 15, 2012, at May 15, 20121:00 PM, Alexey Petrushin wrote: > Yes, it's more handy to have it synced (although, maybe it should be also > allow to be used in async manner, for sake of completeness, but not sure > about it). > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
