Done. I'd minimize the chattiness of the conversation though. Things like:
-- I have divided the work into pieces and every process will work on one of these pieces in parallel. -- Why don't you create threads? -- Sorry, I don't think it is usable. You can take your computer if you want? -- No okay, I am cool, I just don't understand why you don't use threads? aren't helping it, there's a lot to read there and not much of it is contributing. On Saturday, June 30, 2012 6:13:11 PM UTC-7, hasanyasin wrote: > > Hey everybody, > > I would brazenly like to ask your up-votes for my answer about a question > on Node and threading. I know I might sound unbelievably inappropriate by > nosing the group with this; but I have spent an hour of my time to explain > why Node is good and how it works and I did this to help Node be understood > better. If a few people here just up-votes it, I hope it reaches more > people and it can be a tiny addition for the project's public image. > > Here is the answer I have submitted: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10773564/which-would-be-better-for-concurrent-tasks-on-node-js-fibers-web-workers-or-t/11278689#11278689 > > I am writing an article which will be the first in a series. I see many > people seeing Node as something cool without understanding the main thing. > I will disturb you again when my first article is public. In the meantime, > do you suggest anywhere online for an article series on Node instead of > opening a website for this myself? > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
