https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/4273
Seems that's it.
Also cb uses process.nextTick and feels bad in a synchronous benchmark so
had to add { async: true } to it's benchmarks.
понедельник, 12 ноября 2012 г., 0:06:29 UTC+7 пользователь Alexey
Kupershtokh написал:
>
> The benchmark seems broken: I've added gc() & output memory after it in
> on('cycle') and the memory usage is growing.
>
> воскресенье, 11 ноября 2012 г., 16:37:53 UTC+7 пользователь Alexey
> Kupershtokh написал:
>>
>> Jason, in your turn you've inspired me how to improve candle's usage
>> syntax :) I'll try to implement this later.
>>
>> Also I've added a benchmark to compare our projects -
>> https://github.com/AlexeyKupershtokh/node-candle/blob/master/benchmark/compare.js
>> My numbers are in the table too.
>> Please check if the benchmark code is fair enough. It measures only the
>> sides that are applicable to the candle.
>>
>> суббота, 10 ноября 2012 г., 22:09:28 UTC+7 пользователь Jason Brumwell
>> написал:
>>>
>>> @Alexey great work on candle, I was looking for something like this for
>>> a project and it had the feature set I needed. The api just didn't feel
>>> right for me, and when I spec'd out how I would write it, it was very close
>>> to cb, so I spent a couple of hours adding the feaures it lacked.
>>>
>>> I wanted to also thank you for creating that table, it outlined a couple
>>> of features that I hadn't thought of but could definitely make use of.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 7:48:56 AM UTC-4, Alexey Kupershtokh
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here it is: https://github.com/AlexeyKupershtokh/node-candle
>>>>
>>>> it's similar to:
>>>> https://github.com/coolaj86/futures/tree/v2.0/future
>>>> and
>>>> https://github.com/temsa/addTimeout
>>>> to some extent, except that the callbacks are able to free in my case
>>>> allowing to avoid leaks.
>>>>
>>>> As an yet another example, if you use a callback wrapped by
>>>> addTimeout(timeout, cb) or future.once(cb).setTimeout(timeout) as an ACK
>>>> callback for a socket.io request that is never acknowledged, this
>>>> wrapepd callback would exist till the socket is disconnected.
>>>>
>>>> Any response is highly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
