@Raynos, @greelgorke I would recommend reading Out of the
tarpit<http://shaffner.us/cs/papers/tarpit.pdf>.
It argues that traditional imperative approach with control flow being
messed with logic leads to complex unmaintainable just ugly software.
On Saturday, December 29, 2012 11:39:28 AM UTC+4, Raynos wrote:
>
> You can implement the same idea with two functions
>
> Here the code is explicit about how it runs code.
>
> ```js
> var execute = require("execute")
> , serial = require("serialize") // unimplemented see
> https://gist.github.com/4405173
>
> var run = serial([
> function (cb) {
> execute({
> sum1: function (cb) { add(1, 2, cb) }
> , sum2: function (cb) { add(3, 4, cb) }
> }, cb)
> }
> , function (result, cb) {
> add(result.sum1, result.sum2, cb)
> }
> ])
>
> run(printResult)
>
> function printResult(err, result) {
> if (err) {
> throw err
> }
> console.log("result", result) // prints "result=10"
> }
> ```
>
> Although your idea is interesting, it's hard to build something that's
> cleaner then just being explicit about how you do things.
>
> Also notice that because we are using clean functional abstractions they
> compose trivially ( http://jsfiddle.net/fvz7N/4/ ) like functions should.
>
> Your ideas however are interesting, the problem is that they are far more
> complex to grok and require trust on self organizing code. Also it's full
> of implicit magic by the very definition of self organizing code.
>
> It should be noted substack had a similar idea with disorder (
> https://github.com/substack/node-disorder#disorder )
>
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
