On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Tim Caswell <t...@creationix.com> wrote:
> I would love to see luvmonkey finished.  Once the core spidermonkey <->
> libuv bindings were complete, the rest could be implemented in pure JS on
> top.  Someone could clone the node.js APIs in pure JS on top of luvmonkey.
>
> From what I know about node's development, changing engines will never
> happen unless V8 completely dies and stops working.  It's a huge task to
> make node and binary node addons work with an engine other than V8.  There
> is a lot of tight coupling there.
>
> Honestly, I think the easiest path is to find some people with motivation,
> time, and skill to complete the luvmonkey bindings and then start a
> community effort to replicate the node.js userspace in js.

I would like to pick up luvmonkey development again.  The great thing
about SpiderMonkey is that it runs on many more platforms and
architectures than V8 (notably SPARC, POWER and PA-RISC, all still big
in the enterprise.)  Porting libuv to HP-UX and AIX would be something
of an undertaking but it's certainly feasible.

The prime issue is, of course, lack of time and/or funds.

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to