> I meant to show that applying this pattern without knowing what it actually does can lead to cases where it simply doesn't work.
Of course if someone doesn't apply the pattern correctly it won't work. This is true for all patterns. There is nothing inherently dangerous about this one. I don't know why people have negative opinions about something simple that makes code readable. Maybe it is a bias against coffeescript in general. I am still of the strong opinion that the blog linked in the OP should be edited to remove the claim that coffeescript can't implement the pattern. I defy anyone to show me some javascript code for that pattern that I can't convert to coffeescript with the only algorithm change being to add a start call at the bottom. That call does not negate any advantages of the blog's pattern. -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
