Right now my soap calls are so deeply nested into my REST routes, I think I have to start pulling those out, and make them more accessible directly. Only then I can mock the specific calls. I was really hoping for a SOAP mock server that I can add the call supports to them but like you said I can simulate that will timeouts and something that returns some fake data.
It is not trivial and it is tedious... On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 9:43:19 AM UTC-7, Paul Ciorogar wrote: > > I would make a mock object that pretends to have the functions and > callbacks of the SOAP server so that I can control what data I can get from > it. > And if you have to wait for multiple asynchronous calls to finish so that > you can reach a conclusion or build a page I would simulate that with a > setTimeout on each callback. > What did you have in mind? > > On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 4:11:03 AM UTC+4, Reza Razavipour wrote: >> >> I am writing a web server in node and express and most of the routes make >> SOAP calls. >> I want to write test cases for my routes. I have enough for my non SOAP >> call features. >> >> So I need to have a mock SOAP server? How would that look? >> >> What are the suggestions for this problem? >> > -- Job board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ New group rules: https://gist.github.com/othiym23/9886289#file-moderation-policy-md Old group rules: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nodejs/6ba9eb2b-c2e1-4d64-82ce-5ef1064c95d9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
