I've not looked at the code but the the two tests still don't look identical given that node transferred 402MB to PHP's 58MB which is reflected in node's almost 7x throughput, which I'd count as a resounding success :) Yet another reason I distrust microbenchmarks like this one.
-- Daniel R. <dani...@neophi.com> [http://danielr.neophi.com/] On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Anirban Bhattacharya < anirbanbhattacharya1...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, > > I made changes to code of node. > > 1. I removed that extra query for use data base and added in connect > paarmeter. > 2. I changed it to createPool. But still the siege output is awkward > > See in node (the upper one) > 1. The number of hits and transactions is less than that of PHP+Apache > in node it is 119171 and for php+apache it is 119429 > 2. Longest transaction is more in node than PHP > > > Why is so? What will be a good basic scenario which can show me NODe has > better values for these > > ====================================================After Doing > pool============================================== > anirbanb2004@Anisoft-Corporation:~/nodecode/express/siegeLog$ siege -c100 > -d1 -t10M -lnode.log http://localhost:9615/ > ** SIEGE 3.0.5 > ** Preparing 100 concurrent users for battle. > The server is now under siege... > Lifting the server siege... done. > > Transactions: 119171 hits > Availability: 100.00 % > Elapsed time: 599.32 secs > Data transferred: 402.78 MB > Response time: 0.00 secs > Transaction rate: 198.84 trans/sec > Throughput: 0.67 MB/sec > Concurrency: 0.67 > Successful transactions: 119171 > Failed transactions: 0 > Longest transaction: 0.10 > Shortest transaction: 0.00 > > FILE: node.log > > anirbanb2004@Anisoft-Corporation:~/nodecode/express/siegeLog$ siege -c100 > -d1 -t10M -lphp.log http://localhost/loadTest/ > ** SIEGE 3.0.5 > ** Preparing 100 concurrent users for battle. > The server is now under siege... > Lifting the server siege... done. > > Transactions: 119429 hits > Availability: 100.00 % > Elapsed time: 599.04 secs > Data transferred: 58.77 MB > Response time: 0.00 secs > Transaction rate: 199.37 trans/sec > Throughput: 0.10 MB/sec > Concurrency: 0.36 > Successful transactions: 119429 > Failed transactions: 0 > Longest transaction: 0.04 > Shortest transaction: 0.00 > > FILE: php.log > > > On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 3:34:57 PM UTC-6, Anirban Bhattacharya > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I am new to node. very new ..like infant. >> Either I am doing something wrong or I understood everything wrong. >> I wrote a node js simple JSON emitter which uses mysql module and query >> (select *) from a single table haviing 100 records and outputs on page as >> JSON (JSON.stringify.. >> >> I wrote a PHP page which also does the same thing from same table(Apache). >> >> I used Siege for load test and surprisingly it shows better values for >> the PHP than that of node .. see below the output of siege >> ==================NODE================= >> anirbanb2004@Anisoft-Corporation:~$ siege -c100 -d1 -t10M -lnode.log >> http://localhost:9615/ >> ** SIEGE 3.0.5 >> ** Preparing 100 concurrent users for battle. >> The server is now under siege... >> Lifting the server siege... done. >> >> Transactions: 119236 hits >> Availability: 100.00 % >> Elapsed time: 599.74 secs >> Data transferred: 403.00 MB >> Response time: 0.00 secs >> Transaction rate: 198.81 trans/sec >> Throughput: 0.67 MB/sec >> Concurrency: 0.61 >> Successful transactions: 119236 >> Failed transactions: 0 >> Longest transaction: 0.05 >> Shortest transaction: 0.00 >> >> FILE: node.log >> =================PHP================== >> anirbanb2004@Anisoft-Corporation:~$ siege -c100 -d1 -t10M -lphp.log >> http://localhost/loadTest >> ** SIEGE 3.0.5 >> ** Preparing 100 concurrent users for battle. >> The server is now under siege... >> Lifting the server siege... done. >> >> Transactions: 119632 hits >> Availability: 100.00 % >> Elapsed time: 599.47 secs >> Data transferred: 34.58 MB >> Response time: 0.00 secs >> Transaction rate: 199.56 trans/sec >> Throughput: 0.06 MB/sec >> Concurrency: 0.12 >> Successful transactions: 59858 >> Failed transactions: 0 >> Longest transaction: 0.03 >> Shortest transaction: 0.00 >> >> FILE: php.log >> >> can anyone please help me understand what is wrong here? I understand >> some scenario will be there where PHP will perform better. What scenario >> should I create to test Node is better? >> > -- > Job board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > New group rules: > https://gist.github.com/othiym23/9886289#file-moderation-policy-md > Old group rules: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nodejs" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nodejs/11bfd6e8-5ff7-4d55-bad2-c6eb037795d5%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nodejs/11bfd6e8-5ff7-4d55-bad2-c6eb037795d5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Job board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ New group rules: https://gist.github.com/othiym23/9886289#file-moderation-policy-md Old group rules: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nodejs/CAETDeSDvNRHFXrBW_cDJP0W6houTB7G14j9mZ2usJ%2BjQyghS2A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
