Executable code is still tw Then it wouldn't be invis
s'ti ,lacisyhpatem ton s' sa ti drager ot si edoc st'nsi ti gnihtemos secudo
OK, we'd have to be more e inh.mo
tfel eht - ot derrefer saw 
specifying it in more deta 
nr 
this from Alan, from vague two.la
 smelborp eb ll'ereht ebya.edoc sa gnihtemos gnitae
An interesting theory si 
-uen namuh ni esruoc ni tseretni dna srewsna esnoiton 'edoc' tnereffid.

Reply via email to