for simplifying, freedom is basically the logical OR operator, through all the shaggy context of the term - it's a branching port, the parallel and maybe the possible - paradigmatic. on the other hand, the AND operator - sequencial, real, syntagmatic - bondage and restriction - maybe cause-and-effect or we'll see when we build logical expressions from the operators what it will be - and there are different logical implementations of implication/cause-and-effect also. p->q => -p or q : cause and effect, (if p then q) transforms to (not-p or q) so there's freedom in cause-and-effect, or anyway, any AND expression can be transformed into an OR expression. the freedom is between the cause and the effect - there is an implication when there is no cause or when the effect is there - so the implication is a freedom between the possible and the real - here the possible is the no-cause and the real is the effect - and an implication is a transformation from the possible to the real. -p or q => p and -q : the implication's negation, the cause is there without any effect notes anyway, freedom OR transforms into AND glue readily, any talk of freedom is also of AND
the OR's of oh well later man - extensions of media, btw does anyone know details of the human cables, how much sense data we're capable of and usually processing - guess real life experiences would amount to gigas in seconds, something like that, the poverty of media - in reversing media as extension, man as the extension of media, well this might be baudrillard reversing mcluhan already now let's vote if we're for or against something on the assumption of situation s. this is like solving a higher degree equation s, the contexts have to collapse into perspectives s'. the body is hungry h even if it knows that the hunger will return later h', or i will not eat because the satisfaction is only temporary. i would eat if my satisfaction was lasting, then i would eat for the last time, and in that way every thing should be occurring only once, not returning. every word should, well, dlajflewpuAGHKNBLkahd, so it doesn't return, everything is unknown, let's info, recurring, the new, old universe, and inside, what could possibly happen new, it's an adventure, how do you cope then the answer was easy things don't think so much, have simple fun, let's vote the bi-cam any stereo creates context, it's like two points define a line, or two surfaces define a depth - in that sense the context term isn't more mysterious than stereo sight - or the mystery of the line from any point of view - or the mystery of any perspsective from any context
