whenever you need to do something, at that moment it's not possible to do it b) whatever is possible is not needed
why is this? inherent in the possible is the not needed, because if it was needed it would be possible, because needs that are not possible will cease by themselves, because they find no nourishment, because it's not there, because it isn't, because it isn't if possible then not needed if p then -n p -> -n <=> -p or --n <=> -p or n (?!) it's not possible or it's needed does this concern our way of thinking? thinking is a need or else thinking is not possible the free thought is not possible meaning it's a need if you need to think then your thoughts are not free if you need to work then your work is not free for something to be free it has to be not needed if it's not needed it's not possible -n -> -p (?) <=> -n or p <=> p or -n it's possible or not needed it's not necessarily bidirectional which way it goes who knows does the need come first, or the possible? does first come first at all? for something to come first you need a uniform dimension then you can place an orange and an apple in the queue and you can say that the orange comes first for example you may also place the apple first that's the problem if they were all oranges you could say an orange comes first also you can always say that the underlying relation comes first the problem with thinking is that it can be nauseating the food doesn't know where to go the body doesn't know what to do with the food which way it should go anorexia might have a philosophical foundation goedel starved to death who needs food? whatever is possible is not needed
