let's start with thinking something similar the other day while watching a movie where a sheep was walking across the screen. first, i was surprised how rapidly it walked, on four legs, it seemed differently from norwegian sheeps, this was in tibet. and i put the scene on A-B for looping to get an idea what was going on. during the looping i kind projected the two-leg onto the four-leg animal, comical, and realized how efficient the four-legged. and then why should it change? from that point of view humans maybe was forced to change to survive, because they were so lousy at what they were doing so to speak. finally we developed language because we were so bad at doing things. later on we were lucky realizing that language could control all the doings.
the cereal mix has 7 different fruits. and there are illustrations of banana, apple, coconut, etc. waiting for the coffee to set in i wonder how the abstract concepts came to exist - like 'fruit' instead of the concrete thing illustrated. sure it's just a grouping, and reference. let's imagine a protoculture. a thing as one and only one name. how far do we get? all is well. person p goes on a journey to get thing t. t is called t2 by person p2 maybe from another culture. so t is t2? ok, but still, why should our friend call it t2 to his culture when he already has a name t? so one of the first things we realize is that multiple names to one thing is a result from interculture. more basically, a thing is not a thing, so the name creates the thing. for instance, when the wind is cold or comes from a special direction, well one could always call that a thing. a better example is an action, or a negation of a thing maybe. there is no cereal left. already that messes it up. still the instinct. could we have negative ads finally? with illustrations of what's not there. an anti-ontology. t is the name of animals viewed from a far distance. warped. the particles do their work quite well. the computer remembers my writing while i forget. we're the consumers of ourselves. the beaver knows how to make a dam house without having learnt it. the autist has sexual desires never conditioned by culture. we are welcomed. who asked you to take control of your person? of who you are? the adventure of naming. let's be honest, isn't language only silly names all in a mess? the vulcans are still alive. behind it all are mathematics and statistics, how come such fine friends produce such horrors? we're in the middle of top bottom up down strange charm - ducstb duckstab - quack! in the middle there's a calm, what else would be in the middle? the middle. where do you go from the middle? things are done with language. does that mean that things are no longer done by doing? those dances are supposed to make you capable of doing. make you capable of doing? i think that was up and down the mountain again, sisyfos thing. now sisyfos with that strange name, what can be said about him. that's when language does things. it does it too well. there's the peak also, that's when one thing has exactly one name. that's god. let's imagine there was a strict rule that any thing must have several names in order to keep god's name sacred. well, that's not different from -. we live in the richness of things, what can we expect. don't expect something to descend without messing itself and you up. n-1 sort of. end of lecture , any questions?
