I vote to get rid of the rule. I didn't even realize we had it. I made a trade 
a year or two ago, for the last month to cover myself at a position, when I 
realized that I was going to run out of atbats. They were crappy atbats to, so 
I was at a pretty good disadvantage. I've never understood why someone would 
even want to play someone out of position for an extended period of time, 
unrealistic to me. I'll just plan my team roster that way, and manage without 
it, with or without the rule change. Just play with no injuries and it 
shouldn't be that difficult. Randy> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:50:47 -0800> 
Subject: Re: position restrictions> From: [email protected]> To: 
[email protected]> > > Are we talking about paragraph 2.3 of the 
Constitution that says "The> 25-player roster must be named prior to the start 
of the month and> must cover every position on the field and have a backup at 
that> position. For the final month, rosters will expand to 40."> > I vote YES 
and get rid of it.> > However, I do support the idea that on the 40 man roster 
each fielded> position have 2 players. One player can cover more than one 
position> (i.e. a backup utility fielder that plays 2B,3B and SS satisfies 
that> requirement for those 3 positions).> > I rather not see a team try to 
draft 3 power hitting firs tbasemen and> have to play them at 1B, 3B and 
catcher during the season cause he> didn't draft enough at bats at 3B or 
catcher. I am a strong believer> that players should only start at the position 
that is on their card> and evoke the out of position rule only due to injury or 
lack of late> inning bench support.> > Joe> Suffolk> > > On Feb 2, 5:47 am, 
[email protected] wrote:> > Norfolk gives thumbs down also to Lous rule> >> > 
-----Original Message-----> > From: Bob Oakman <[email protected]>> > To: 
[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 2:22 pm> > Subject: Re: 
position restrictions> >> > Buzz gives the thumbs down on the "Lou rule"> >> > 
--- On Sun, 2/1/09, LOU VINCENT <[email protected]> wrote:> >> > From: LOU 
VINCENT <[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: position restrictions> > To: 
[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 11:17 AM> >> > Please 
everyone respect Robert's request to vote on getting rid of this unneccessary 
rule...........> >> > ?> >> > Please try to get this done ASAP, as this will 
impact the draft...........> >> > ?> >> > ?> >> > P.S. - Tim ( Lakeland 
)........................We are still waiting for your selection, as the people 
behind you are getting excited to select.> >> > ?> >> > Thanks,? lou> >> > 
----- Original Message -----> >> > From: LOU VINCENT> >> > To: 
[email protected]> >> > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:11 PM> >> > 
Subject: Re: position restrictions> >> > I agree.we should get rid of the "LOU 
RULE ", as this is entirely not needed................Lou> >> > ----- Original 
Message -----> >> > From: Scott Fritchman> >> > To: [email protected]> >> 
> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:09 PM> >> > Subject: Re: position 
restrictions> >> > if you can use players anywhere then i see no reason why you 
have to have a backup at all postions.? i vote to get rid of it!> >> > On Sun, 
Feb 1, 2009 at 2:06 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:> >> > 
The rules are that way because Lou you wanted that rule in years ago. ?However 
SOMBB advance rules say that you can play players out of postion making their 
rating the worst it can be except for the outfield. ?Lou you ask about this 
rule everytime the subject comes up. ?I will remind you that was because we had 
a team that went to the playoffs playing all year with only 1 catcher on his 
roster. Thus the LOU rule (to be fair most agreed with you about putting the 
rule in). However now that we use strat's rules about playing out of position 
we certainly can do away with the LOU rule as I also see no reason for it any 
longer. ?It doesnt matter to me.> >> > ROBERT> >> > Please note: message 
attached> >> > ____________________________________________________________> > 
Earn your accounting degree online. Free info. Click 
Now!http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/PnY6rbttHT8XLZ20ExRQA9dHc...> 
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------> > From:?"LOU VINCENT" 
<[email protected]>> > To:?<[email protected]>> > Date:?Sun, 1 Feb 2009 
08:40:52 -0500> > Subject:?Re: position restrictions> >> > There arn't any true 
rules..........You can play 8 catchers if you want......................The 
rules state you have to have a player listed for each position, and a backup at 
each position ( although I'm not sure why, as stated above )...............> >> 
> ----- Original Message -----> >> > From: [email protected]> >> > To: 
[email protected]> >> > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:16 AM> >> > 
Subject: position restrictions> >> > Hi All,> >> > ?????????? Just wondering, 
what are the rules concerning playing a position not listed on a players card 
?> >> > And by the way ?thanks Lou the eligibility?info listed in your 
file?saved me a ton of?time. I owe you a beer.> >> > ???????????????????? 
thanks,> >> > ???????????????????? Blaine?????????> >> > 
????????????????????????????> >> > In a message dated 1/31/2009 12:21:52 A.M. 
Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:> >> > Idea I am shopping 
Thome (know of 1 team with some interest) but Tides last year had Lee at 1B who 
was a 1 and took 1B Pena who is 1 and played his 40 hrs in LF as a 5. They did 
make the playoffs. Might you are anyone else be interested in THOME in LF?? I 
am already knee deep in 1B and will proably use one of my 3 C at 1B just to get 
their bat in the lineup. That would still leave Pean and Votto at 1B.? I am 
seriously hoping to move him as I would rather see him go to team that can use 
him rather than platoon him.??> >> > ROBERT> >> > Please note: message 
attached> >> > ____________________________________________________________> > 
FTD.com> > Shop now and save $15 on Flowers and Gifts from 
FTD!http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/u4MuSHFRkLY7vsadhzzw5IHQT...> 
>> > Hello Robert;> >> > can't believe this work by Lou, life-saver!> >> > I 
can see you are well stocked at C and OF..> >> > I have been offered two RP and 
two later picks thus far..> >> > what can you spare for the measley Cubs?> >> > 
Mike> >> > ?> >> > -------------- Original message --------------> > From: 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>> >> > > I am willing to trade you my 
pick for your pick I think mine is 17th as I am> > > still looking for SP. I 
will just have to hope there is still 1 there.> >> > > ROBERT-VA> >> > > Please 
note: message attached> >> > > 
____________________________________________________________> > > Take a break 
- you deserve it. Click here to find a great vacation.> > 
>http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/PnY6rbu5oQeFhQUqSrazEuEEw...> > > 
D0mEfP0upyEESNkmr/> >> > style="FONT: 10pt arial,san-serif; COLOR: black"> 
Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499.> >> > received this message 
because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group.> > To post to 
this group, send email to [email protected]> > To unsubscribe from this 
group, send email to [email protected]> > For more options, 
visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en> > 
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---> >> > received this 
message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group.> > To 
post to this group, send email to [email protected]> > To unsubscribe from 
this group, send email to [email protected]> > For more 
options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en> > 
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---> 
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Liveā„¢: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_012009
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to