the old games had the same under useage chart but every year teams went over.
How is the new game different.
ROBERT
Please note: message attached
From: john arcieri <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: schedule for 2009 only
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
____________________________________________________________
Click to find information on your credit score and your credit report.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsHCkSt0SRdGLwmnNo4c4eMIQRsxKlZoGI6Lv4YJJxTNxoR02fZfKw/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- Begin Message ---
There is no need to worry about over usage since the new version keeps anyone
for over using their players by just checking limiting overusage. So there
hould be no excuse for over using players unless we go to 164 which I agree
with Robert go with 160 instead of 164.
________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 5:02:04 AM
Subject: Re: schedule for 2009 only
160 that way no one has any excuse for overuseage.
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry M Reickart <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 8:28 pm
Subject: Re: schedule for 2009 only
Robert,
Even schedule it is. everyone has 19 opponents so that would be 8 games
vs. all for 152 games...then if we play our 4 divisional foes either 2 or 3
games extra that will give us 160 or 164 games, whichever you'd prefer.
LMK and I'll put it together.
Harry
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 4:50 PM
Subject: schedule for 2009 only
have talked with Lou and it was suggested that we go to even schedule for
this year only. Everyone plays everyone the same # of times as teams in weak
divisions get to get better winning % than those is stacked divisions. This
is important as the home field advantage goes to the team with the best
winning %!
So we have decided to try it for just this season and after the season will
take a vote on keeping it or change it. So HARRY if you would please just
make the schedule that way for this year I would appreciate it greatly.
Also if anyone has any ideas as to how we should redo the divisions next
year please let me know. We change then every 3 yrs and maybe someone can
come up with a fair way or preferred way to do that. Last time we did a
whole division with CALF/west coast teams but now some of them are no longer
with us so that wont work again.
God NOMBLing to everyone as opening day is very close,
ROBERT
____________________________________________________________
Looking for insurance? Click to compare and save big.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsHF60P8FpUycxGW1uzbby4qAEILqCgfQAXYTwl0BhWKmsvVqrX0wY/
________________________________
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- End Message ---
